Tourniquet, pressure and sutures have been used for controlling excessive bleeding during surgical procedures for many hundreds of years. Fibrin sealants represented a revolution in local hemostatic measures for both bleeding and nonbleeding disorders. Fibrin sealant has the potential to provide life-saving control of excessive bleeding in many critical surgical operations and during a number of elective procedures. The terms “sealant” and “glue” are frequently used interchangeably in the surgical context, but there is actually a difference in adhesive strength between sealants, pioneered by fibrin products (sometimes homemade) and the later, stronger glues of which cyanoacrylate-based products were the leaders.
In order for a sealant to be effective, the product should meet several parameters, depending upon the application. Among these are:
- Ability to close the wound
- Strength of bond
- Speed of curing
- Protection of the wound from infection
- Low surface friction
- Breathability in order to aid healing
- Lack of adverse side effects to skin and internal tissues
- Ease of handling
Fibrin and other sealant products have been approved and used outside the United States for many years and their use has created strong awareness of their surgical and economic benefits in Europe, Latin America and Asia. As a result, many such products have been marketed in these regions for 20 years or more, and have been developed for a variety of surgical uses. In the U.S., these products were initially approved as hemostatic adjuncts to suturing. They are increasingly being used for sealing of tissues, but their use beyond hemostasis (i.e., as sealants and low-strength glues) lags that of markets outside the U.S.
There are more than 30 companies worldwide developing fibrin sealants and driving a market that will exceed $2.2 billion by 2017.
Source: MedMarket Diligence, LLC; Report #S190.
For complete analysis of the global market for fibrin sealants, see the MedMarket Diligence Report #S190, “Worldwide Surgical Sealants, Glues, Wound Closure and Anti-Adhesion Markets, 2010-2017.”