Tag Archives: gastric stimulation

Clinical management of obesity (devices, drugs) worldwide

The recent withdrawal by Abbott Labs of its obesity drug, Meridia, and the rejection by the FDA of Arena Phamaceutical’s lorcaserin places even sharper focus on the continuing demand for effective obesity treatment.  Currently, and possibly for some time to come, the clinical intervention in the management of obesity is largely dominated by surgical and device options.

The outlook for manufacturers remains strongly in favor of clinical options as the prevalence of obesity, and its essentially co-morbid partner, diabetes, increases steadily worldwide.

“Products, Technologies and Markets Worldwide for the Clinical Management of Obesity, 2009-2019″, publishing October 2010 from MedMarket Diligence, details the current status of product development for drugs and devices for treatment of obesity and provides a global market forecast. See link for details.

Another obesity drug misses the mark

The opportunity for a weight loss drug to aid in the battle against obesity remains largely untouched especially with the decision by an FDA panel this week to reject, by a vote of 9-5, Arena Pharmaceuticals' lorcaserin, concluding that its benefits do not outweigh its risks.

Lorcaserin, an appetite suppressant that works in the brain (and potentially avoids the heart valve-damaging effects of another appetite supressant, fenfluramine, notoriously pulled from the market in the fen-phen combination), was considered safer.  But the FDA panel ruled against it, citing more questions of uncertainty than identifiable risks.

Obesity has been furiously driving product development and clinical practice due to its burgeoning prevalence and its association with diabetes, cancer, heart disease, arthritis and others.  A variety of surgical procedures like gastric bypass (e.g., Roux-en-Y anastomosis) and others with devices (stapling, lapband, gastric stimulation and others) are seeing growth in procedure volume and device sales.  These approaches have demonstrated moderate success, and will likely continue to find favor even as alternatives to obesity-targeted drugs, but there is great recognition in clinical practice and the pharmaceutical industry that the obesity opportunity for drugs is persistently high and tantalizingly out of reach, even for the limited approved drugs.  According to the WSJ:

[On September 15], the [FDA] advisory committee split down the middle on the issue of whether Abbott’s weight-loss drug Meridia, which has been on the market since 1997, should be pulled over concerns about cardiovascular side effects. In July, Vivus’s experimental diet drug Qnexa was rejected by the advisory committee. Another experimental weight-loss drug, Orexigen’s Contrave, will be weighed by the panel later this year.

An even more extensive list of drugs remain in the investigative, preclinical and clinical pipeline.  It seems inevitable, one would think, that pharma companies would advance their development and learn sufficiently from, failed attempts, to bring a candidate to the FDA that will hit the mark.

In the meantime, the opportunity just keeps getting bigger and bigger…


See the (pending)  September 2010 Report #S835 by MedMarket Diligence, "Products, Technologies and Markets Worldwide for the Clinical Management of Obesity, 2009-2019".