Adoption of surgical securement products by clinical category and key determinants

The potential for products in the surgical securement (sealants, glues, sutures/staples, hemostats, anti-adhesion) is driven by clinical category and the impact of the particular products, in each specialty, on a hierarchy of determinants, from the "important and enabling" to the "aesthetic and perceived benefits".  This results in a variable distribution by clinical category in the potential of each.

On a relative basis (absolute values provided in report S175), the distribution by clinical category for the adjunctive use of sealants, glues, hemostats and anti-adhesion products are illustrated below graphically, followed by the description of each category.



Category I: Important and Enabling
Important to prevent excessive bleeding and transfusion, to ensure safe procedure, and to avoid mortality and to avoid complications associated with excessive bleeding and loss of blood.

Category II: Improved Clinical Outcome
Reduces morbidity due to improved procedure, reduced surgery time, and prevention of complications such as fibrosis, post-surgical adhesion formation, and infection (includes adjunct to minimally invasive surgery).

Category III: Cost-Effective and Time-Saving
Immediate reduction in surgical treatment time and follow-up treatments.

Category IV: Aesthetic and Perceived Benefits
Selection is driven by aesthetic and perceived benefits, resulting in one product being favored over a number of medically equivalent treatments.

See report #S175, "Worldwide Surgical Sealants, Glues, Wound Closure and Anti-Adhesion, 2009-2013."

Leave a Reply